Artworks by Arthur Ou

Leslie Hewitt Reading 2.1511: That Is How a Picture Is Attached to Reality: It Reaches Right Out to It

Leslie Hewitt Reading 2.1511: That Is How a Picture Is Attached to Reality: It Reaches Right Out to It

Arthur Ou
Kundmanngasse (Shovels)

Kundmanngasse (Shovels)

Arthur Ou
James Welling Reading 2.0123: If I Know an Object I Also Know All Its Possible Occurrences in States of Affairs. (Every One of These Possibilities Must be Part of the nature of the Object.) A New Possibility Cannot Be Discovered Later

James Welling Reading 2.0123: If I Know an Object I Also Know All Its Possible Occurrences in States of Affairs. (Every One of These Possibilities Must be Part of the nature of the Object.) A New Possibility Cannot Be Discovered Later

Arthur Ou
Moyra Davey Reading 4.114: It Must Set Limits to What Can Be Thought; And, in Doing So, to What Cannot Be Thought. It Must Set Limits to What Cannot Be Thought by Working Outwards Through What Can Be Thought

Moyra Davey Reading 4.114: It Must Set Limits to What Can Be Thought; And, in Doing So, to What Cannot Be Thought. It Must Set Limits to What Cannot Be Thought by Working Outwards Through What Can Be Thought

Arthur Ou
Lisa Tan Reading 2.223: In Order to Tell Whether the Picture Is True or False We Must Compare It With Reality

Lisa Tan Reading 2.223: In Order to Tell Whether the Picture Is True or False We Must Compare It With Reality

Arthur Ou
Uta Barth Reading 4.015: The Possibility of All Imagery, of All Our Pictorial Modes of Expression, is Contained in the Logic of Depiction

Uta Barth Reading 4.015: The Possibility of All Imagery, of All Our Pictorial Modes of Expression, is Contained in the Logic of Depiction

Arthur Ou
Phil Chang Reading 5.632: The Subject Does Not belong to the World: Rather, It Is a Limit of the World

Phil Chang Reading 5.632: The Subject Does Not belong to the World: Rather, It Is a Limit of the World

Arthur Ou
Eileen Quinlan Reading 5.61: Logic Pervades the World: the Limits of the World Are Also Its Limits. So We Cannot Say in Logic, 'The World Has This in It, and This, but Not That.' For That Would Appear to Presuppose That We Were Excluding Certain Possibilities, and This Cannot Be the Case, Since It Would Require That Logic Should Go Beyond the Limits of the World; for Only in That Way Could It View Those Limits From the Other Side As Well. We Cannot Think What We Cannot Think; So What Cannot Think We Cannot Say Either

Eileen Quinlan Reading 5.61: Logic Pervades the World: the Limits of the World Are Also Its Limits. So We Cannot Say in Logic, 'The World Has This in It, and This, but Not That.' For That Would Appear to Presuppose That We Were Excluding Certain Possibilities, and This Cannot Be the Case, Since It Would Require That Logic Should Go Beyond the Limits of the World; for Only in That Way Could It View Those Limits From the Other Side As Well. We Cannot Think What We Cannot Think; So What Cannot Think We Cannot Say Either

Arthur Ou
Joachim Schmid Reading 6.51: Skepticism Is Not Irrefutable, but Obviously Nonsensical, When It Tries to Raise Doubts Where No Questions Can Be Asked. For Doubt Can Exist Only Where a Question Exists, a Question Only Where an Answer Exists, and an Answer Only Where Something Can Be Said

Joachim Schmid Reading 6.51: Skepticism Is Not Irrefutable, but Obviously Nonsensical, When It Tries to Raise Doubts Where No Questions Can Be Asked. For Doubt Can Exist Only Where a Question Exists, a Question Only Where an Answer Exists, and an Answer Only Where Something Can Be Said

Arthur Ou
Nigel Shafran Reading 6.44: It Is Not How Things Are in the World

Nigel Shafran Reading 6.44: It Is Not How Things Are in the World

Arthur Ou
Lucas Blalock Reading 3.221: Objects Can Only Be Named. Signs Are Their Representatives. I Can Only Speak About Them: I Cannot Put Them Into Words. Propositions Can Only Say How Things Are, Not What They Are.

Lucas Blalock Reading 3.221: Objects Can Only Be Named. Signs Are Their Representatives. I Can Only Speak About Them: I Cannot Put Them Into Words. Propositions Can Only Say How Things Are, Not What They Are.

Arthur Ou
Barbara Probst reading 2.15: The Fact That the Elements of a Picture Are Related to One ANother in a Determinate Way Represents That Things Are Related to One Another in the Same Way. Let Us Called This Connexion on Its Elements the Structure of the Picture, and Let Us Call the Possibility of This Structure the Pictorial Form of the Picture.

Barbara Probst reading 2.15: The Fact That the Elements of a Picture Are Related to One ANother in a Determinate Way Represents That Things Are Related to One Another in the Same Way. Let Us Called This Connexion on Its Elements the Structure of the Picture, and Let Us Call the Possibility of This Structure the Pictorial Form of the Picture.

Arthur Ou
Barbara Kasten Reading 4.1212: What Can Be Shown, Cannot Be Said

Barbara Kasten Reading 4.1212: What Can Be Shown, Cannot Be Said

Arthur Ou
Luisa Lambri Reading 5.63: I Am My World. (The Microcosm)

Luisa Lambri Reading 5.63: I Am My World. (The Microcosm)

Arthur Ou
Amir Zaki Reading 2.161: There Must Be Something Identical in a Picture and What It Depicts, to Enable the One to Be a Picture of the Otherat All.

Amir Zaki Reading 2.161: There Must Be Something Identical in a Picture and What It Depicts, to Enable the One to Be a Picture of the Otherat All.

Arthur Ou
Pradeep Dalal Reading 4.021: A Proposition Is a Picture of Reality: for it I Understand a Proposition, I Know the Situation It Represents. And I Understand the Proposition. Without Having Had Its Sense Explained to Me.

Pradeep Dalal Reading 4.021: A Proposition Is a Picture of Reality: for it I Understand a Proposition, I Know the Situation It Represents. And I Understand the Proposition. Without Having Had Its Sense Explained to Me.

Arthur Ou
Arash Fewzee Reading 4.2211: Even if the World Is Infinitely Complex, so That Every Fact Consists of Infinitely Many States of Affairs and Every State of Many Objects, There Would Still Have to Be Objects and States of Affairs

Arash Fewzee Reading 4.2211: Even if the World Is Infinitely Complex, so That Every Fact Consists of Infinitely Many States of Affairs and Every State of Many Objects, There Would Still Have to Be Objects and States of Affairs

Arthur Ou
Susanne Kriemann Reading 5.5423: To Perceive a Complex Means to Perceive That Its Constituents Are Related to One Another in Such and Such Way. This No Doubt Also Explains Why There Are Two Possible Ways of Seeing the Figure as a Cube; and All Similar Phenomena. For We Really See Two Different Facts. (If I Look in the First Place at the Corners Marked A and Only Glance at the B's, Then the A's Appear to be in Front, and Vice Versa)

Susanne Kriemann Reading 5.5423: To Perceive a Complex Means to Perceive That Its Constituents Are Related to One Another in Such and Such Way. This No Doubt Also Explains Why There Are Two Possible Ways of Seeing the Figure as a Cube; and All Similar Phenomena. For We Really See Two Different Facts. (If I Look in the First Place at the Corners Marked A and Only Glance at the B's, Then the A's Appear to be in Front, and Vice Versa)

Arthur Ou
Viktoria Binschtok Reading 6.13: Logic Is Not a Body of Doctrine, but a Mirror-Image of the World. Logic Is Transcendental

Viktoria Binschtok Reading 6.13: Logic Is Not a Body of Doctrine, but a Mirror-Image of the World. Logic Is Transcendental

Arthur Ou
Tatiana Krongberg Reading 5.511: How Can Logic—All-Embracing Logic, Which Mirrors the World—Use Such Peculiar Crotchets and Contrivances? Only Because They Are All Connected With One Another in an Infinitely Fine Network, the Great Mirror

Tatiana Krongberg Reading 5.511: How Can Logic—All-Embracing Logic, Which Mirrors the World—Use Such Peculiar Crotchets and Contrivances? Only Because They Are All Connected With One Another in an Infinitely Fine Network, the Great Mirror

Arthur Ou